Innovation-Led Clusters: A Benchmarking Report (TechVision)

Innovation-Led Clusters: A Benchmarking Report (TechVision)

A Benchmarking Study on Innovation-led clusters

RELEASE DATE
29-Sep-2015
REGION
Global
Research Code: D6B4-01-00-00-00
SKU: CM01054-GL-TR_17170
AvailableYesPDF Download
$4,950.00
In stock
SKU
CM01054-GL-TR_17170
$4,950.00
DownloadLink
ENQUIRE NOW

Description

Innovation-led clusters are geographical concentrations of interconnected companies, universities, research & development organizations and government bodies that collaborate to support an innovation ecosystem that increases productivity and spurring new innovations. Some well-known examples of clusters are Silicon Valley, the automotive district of Detroit, the film industry of Hollywood, the wineries of France and the financial district of New York. This report studies Innovation-led clusters across the following clusters: Healthcare, Energy, Materials & Coatings, Information & Communication Technologies and Automation & Electronics. The significance of the clusters across each industry has been covered, best practices in each cluster have been identified, innovation-led clusters have been benchmarked to obtain a comparative assessment and key findings for each industry group have been listed.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

A Macro Level Perspective of Innovation Led Cluster

Innovation-Led Clusters in Healthcare

Significance of Innovation-Led Clusters

Benchmarking Clusters for Healthcare

Massachusetts Supercluster

Massachusetts Supercluster (continued)

Massachusetts Supercluster (continued)

San Francisco Bay Area

San Francisco Bay Area (continued)

San Francisco Bay Area (continued)

Berlin-Brandenburg Capital Region

Berlin-Brandenburg Capital Region (continued)

Berlin-Brandenburg Capital Region (continued)

Munich-Bavaria Biotech Cluster

Munich-Bavaria Biotech Cluster (continued)

Munich-Bavaria Biotech Cluster (continued)

Tuas Biomedical Park

Tuas Biomedical Park (continued)

Tuas Biomedical Park (continued)

Biopolis

Biopolis (continued)

Biopolis (continued)

Benchmarking Clusters–Model for Comparing Performances

Key Conclusions

Key Findings

Innovation-Led Clusters in Materials and Coatings

Significance of Innovation-Led Clusters

Clusters Considered for Evaluation

Oak Ridge Carbon Fiber Composites Consortium

Institute for Advanced Composites Manufacturing Innovation (IACMI) Vehicle Technology Area (VTA)

Polymers and Plastics Cluster

Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM)

Technologies for Hybrid Lightweight Construction KITe hyLITE

MAI Carbon Cluster Management GmbH

Carbon Fiber Industrial Cluster

Ulsan Technopark (UTP)

Benchmarking for Comparing Performance of Clusters

Key Conclusions

Significance of Innovation-Led Clusters in Energy & Environment

Elements of Innovation-Led Clusters in Energy & Environment

Benchmarking Countries

Cleantech Clusters Considered for Evaluation

Best Practices–Key Global Learnings from Silicon Valley, USA

Benchmarking Clusters–USA Model

Benchmarking Clusters–USA Model (continued)

Best Practices–Key Global Learnings from Silicon Wadi, Israel

Benchmarking Clusters–Israeli Model

Benchmarking Clusters–Israeli Model (continued)

Best Practices–Key Global Learnings from Dezhou, China

Benchmarking Clusters–China Model

Benchmarking Clusters–China Model (continued)

Key Conclusions

Automation and Electronics Innovation Cluster

Key Findings

Significance of Innovation Led Clusters

Factors Influencing Automation and Electronics Innovation Led Clusters

Countries Considered for Assessment

Flexible Electronics Cluster: FlexMatter-Northeast Ohio, USA

Flexible Electronics Cluster: Forum Organic Electronics- Rhine-Neckar Metropolitan, Germany

Flexible Electronics Cluster: Jeonbuk, Korea

Photonics Cluster: Florida Photonics Cluster, Florida, USA

Photonics Cluster: Optonet, Thuringia, Germany

Photonics Cluster: Korean Association for Photonics Industry, Seoul, Korea

USA: Flexmatter-Best Practices

USA: Florida Photonics-Best Practices

Germany: Forum Organic Electronics-Best Practices

Germany: Optonet-Best Practices

Korea: Printed Electronic Center-Best Practices

Korea Association for Photonics-Best Practices

Benchmarking Countries Best Practices

Benchmarking Clusters–Model

Key Takeaways

Key Conclusions-USA

Key Conclusions-Germany

Key Conclusions-Korea

Key Findings

What is an Innovation-Led Cluster?

Cluster Models and Role of Cluster Policies

Drivers and Restraints for Initiating Clusters

Significance of

Trending Information and Communication Technologies

Elements of Innovation-Led Clusters in ICT

Clusters Considered for Evaluation

Silicon Valley Tech Park (North California), USA

Research Triangle Park (North Carolina ), USA

OULU, Finland - Europe

Silicon Wadi, Israel - Europe

Kista Science City,Sweden - Europe

Science Park, Singapore–Asia Pacific

Zhongguancun Innovation Park, China—Asia Pacific

Benchmarking for Comparing Performance of Clusters

Key Conclusions

Legal Disclaimer

The Frost & Sullivan Story

Value Proposition: Future of Your Company & Career

Global Perspective

Industry Convergence

360º Research Perspective

Implementation Excellence

Our Blue Ocean Strategy

Related Research
Innovation-led clusters are geographical concentrations of interconnected companies, universities, research & development organizations and government bodies that collaborate to support an innovation ecosystem that increases productivity and spurring new innovations. Some well-known examples of clusters are Silicon Valley, the automotive district of Detroit, the film industry of Hollywood, the wineries of France and the financial district of New York. This report studies Innovation-led clusters across the following clusters: Healthcare, Energy, Materials & Coatings, Information & Communication Technologies and Automation & Electronics. The significance of the clusters across each industry has been covered, best practices in each cluster have been identified, innovation-led clusters have been benchmarked to obtain a comparative assessment and key findings for each industry group have been listed.
More Information
No Index No
Podcast No
Author Cecilia Van Cauwenberghe
Industries Chemicals and Materials
WIP Number D6B4-01-00-00-00
Keyword 1 Innovation-Led Clusters
Keyword 2 Innovation Led Clusters in Healthcare
Keyword 3 US Innovation-Led Clusters
Is Prebook No