Innovation-Led Clusters: A Benchmarking Report (TechVision)
Innovation-Led Clusters: A Benchmarking Report (TechVision)
A Benchmarking Study on Innovation-led clusters
29-Sep-2015
Global
Description
Innovation-led clusters are geographical concentrations of interconnected companies, universities, research & development organizations and government bodies that collaborate to support an innovation ecosystem that increases productivity and spurring new innovations. Some well-known examples of clusters are Silicon Valley, the automotive district of Detroit, the film industry of Hollywood, the wineries of France and the financial district of New York. This report studies Innovation-led clusters across the following clusters: Healthcare, Energy, Materials & Coatings, Information & Communication Technologies and Automation & Electronics. The significance of the clusters across each industry has been covered, best practices in each cluster have been identified, innovation-led clusters have been benchmarked to obtain a comparative assessment and key findings for each industry group have been listed.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
A Macro Level Perspective of Innovation Led Cluster
Innovation-Led Clusters in Healthcare
Significance of Innovation-Led Clusters
Benchmarking Clusters for Healthcare
Massachusetts Supercluster
Massachusetts Supercluster (continued)
Massachusetts Supercluster (continued)
San Francisco Bay Area
San Francisco Bay Area (continued)
San Francisco Bay Area (continued)
Berlin-Brandenburg Capital Region
Berlin-Brandenburg Capital Region (continued)
Berlin-Brandenburg Capital Region (continued)
Munich-Bavaria Biotech Cluster
Munich-Bavaria Biotech Cluster (continued)
Munich-Bavaria Biotech Cluster (continued)
Tuas Biomedical Park
Tuas Biomedical Park (continued)
Tuas Biomedical Park (continued)
Biopolis
Biopolis (continued)
Biopolis (continued)
Benchmarking Clusters–Model for Comparing Performances
Key Conclusions
Key Findings
Innovation-Led Clusters in Materials and Coatings
Significance of Innovation-Led Clusters
Clusters Considered for Evaluation
Oak Ridge Carbon Fiber Composites Consortium
Institute for Advanced Composites Manufacturing Innovation (IACMI) Vehicle Technology Area (VTA)
Polymers and Plastics Cluster
Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM)
Technologies for Hybrid Lightweight Construction KITe hyLITE
MAI Carbon Cluster Management GmbH
Carbon Fiber Industrial Cluster
Ulsan Technopark (UTP)
Benchmarking for Comparing Performance of Clusters
Key Conclusions
Significance of Innovation-Led Clusters in Energy & Environment
Elements of Innovation-Led Clusters in Energy & Environment
Benchmarking Countries
Cleantech Clusters Considered for Evaluation
Best Practices–Key Global Learnings from Silicon Valley, USA
Benchmarking Clusters–USA Model
Benchmarking Clusters–USA Model (continued)
Best Practices–Key Global Learnings from Silicon Wadi, Israel
Benchmarking Clusters–Israeli Model
Benchmarking Clusters–Israeli Model (continued)
Best Practices–Key Global Learnings from Dezhou, China
Benchmarking Clusters–China Model
Benchmarking Clusters–China Model (continued)
Key Conclusions
Automation and Electronics Innovation Cluster
Key Findings
Significance of Innovation Led Clusters
Factors Influencing Automation and Electronics Innovation Led Clusters
Countries Considered for Assessment
Flexible Electronics Cluster: FlexMatter-Northeast Ohio, USA
Flexible Electronics Cluster: Forum Organic Electronics- Rhine-Neckar Metropolitan, Germany
Flexible Electronics Cluster: Jeonbuk, Korea
Photonics Cluster: Florida Photonics Cluster, Florida, USA
Photonics Cluster: Optonet, Thuringia, Germany
Photonics Cluster: Korean Association for Photonics Industry, Seoul, Korea
USA: Flexmatter-Best Practices
USA: Florida Photonics-Best Practices
Germany: Forum Organic Electronics-Best Practices
Germany: Optonet-Best Practices
Korea: Printed Electronic Center-Best Practices
Korea Association for Photonics-Best Practices
Benchmarking Countries Best Practices
Benchmarking Clusters–Model
Key Takeaways
Key Conclusions-USA
Key Conclusions-Germany
Key Conclusions-Korea
Key Findings
What is an Innovation-Led Cluster?
Cluster Models and Role of Cluster Policies
Drivers and Restraints for Initiating Clusters
Significance of
Trending Information and Communication Technologies
Elements of Innovation-Led Clusters in ICT
Clusters Considered for Evaluation
Silicon Valley Tech Park (North California), USA
Research Triangle Park (North Carolina ), USA
OULU, Finland - Europe
Silicon Wadi, Israel - Europe
Kista Science City,Sweden - Europe
Science Park, Singapore–Asia Pacific
Zhongguancun Innovation Park, China—Asia Pacific
Benchmarking for Comparing Performance of Clusters
Key Conclusions
Legal Disclaimer
The Frost & Sullivan Story
Value Proposition: Future of Your Company & Career
Global Perspective
Industry Convergence
360º Research Perspective
Implementation Excellence
Our Blue Ocean Strategy
Related Research
Popular Topics
No Index | No |
---|---|
Podcast | No |
Author | Cecilia Van Cauwenberghe |
Industries | Chemicals and Materials |
WIP Number | D6B4-01-00-00-00 |
Keyword 1 | Innovation-Led Clusters |
Keyword 2 | Innovation Led Clusters in Healthcare |
Keyword 3 | US Innovation-Led Clusters |
Is Prebook | No |