Smart City Pulse

Smart City Pulse

Survey of Solution Providers Offers Insights into Key Global Trends and the Future of Smart Cities

RELEASE DATE
23-Sep-2016
REGION
North America
Research Code: K03B-01-00-00-00
SKU: CI00241-NA-MT_19192
AvailableYesPDF Download

$4,950.00

Special Price $3,712.50 save 25 %

In stock
SKU
CI00241-NA-MT_19192

$4,950.00

$3,712.50save 25 %

DownloadLink
ENQUIRE NOW

Description

The Smart City movement continues to gain traction, with increasing connectivity and novel solutions joining forces to tackle urbanization's top challenges. As cities undertake Smart City initiatives, solution providers must develop offerings aligned with customer expectations, and city-customers must convey the motivators propelling and restraints impacting their projects. This study offers solution providers’ perspectives on current Smart City readiness and trends, including project intensity by region and revenue growth projections; top Smart City engagement challenges, city motivations, and project restraints; popular funding instruments; and predictions on technology innovations and future Smart City scenarios. The survey year is 2016.

Table of Contents

Key Findings

Research Scope

  • Survey Year
  • Survey Timeframe
  • Geographical Scope
  • Concepts Covered

Research Background

Methodology

Activity in Smart City Concepts

Revenue Attributed to Smart City Solutions

Degree of Smart City Focus on Global Regions

  • Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in a Listed Smart City Concept, Global, 2016

Activity in Smart City Concepts by Region of Focus

Current and Future Smart City Market Position

  • Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Country is of Great Interest for their Organization’s Smart City Pursuits—Top 3 Countries per Region, Global, 2016
  • Smart City Pulse: Average Percentage of Smart City Focus Organizations Place on Listed Regions Broken Down by Region of Headquarters—North America, Europe, and Latin America Outflows, Global, 2016
  • Smart City Pulse: Average Percentage of Smart City Focus Organizations Place on Listed Regions Broken Down by Region of Headquarters—Middle East, Asia-Pacific, and Africa Outflows, Global, 2016

Receptivity to the Smart City Concept

Overview of Top 5 Challenges, Motivations, and Restraints for Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016

Smart City Engagement Challenges

Smart City Motivations

Smart City Project Restraints

Smart City Influencers

Smart City Funding Overview

Smart City Business Models

Smart City Project Types

Smart City Solution Showcasing Vehicle

Future Smart City Technologies

Smart Governance and Education

Smart Healthcare

Smart Buildings

Smart Mobility

Smart Infrastructure

Smart Technology

Smart Energy

Smart Citizens

Smart Security

Key Takeaways

Organization Revenues and Respondent Levels

Region of Organization Headquarters

Regions Served by Organizations

Legal Disclaimer

Other Responses Provided

List of Figures
  • 1. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2015 and 2016
  • 2. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 3. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 4. Smart City Pulse: Average Percentage of Smart City Focus Organizations Place on Listed Regions, Global, 2016
  • 5. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in a Listed Smart City Concept Broken Down by Region of Focus, Global, 2016
  • 6. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Current and Future Market Position of Organizations, Global, 2016
  • 7. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Degree of City-Customer Receptivity to Smart City Concepts by Population Size, Global, 2016
  • 8. Smart City Pulse: Ranking of Project Engagement Challenges for Organizations According to Percentage of Total Points Allocated by Respondents, Global, 2016
  • 9. Smart City Pulse: Ranking of City Motivations According to Percentage of Total Points Allocated by Respondents, Global, 2016*
  • 10. Smart City Pulse: Ranking of Project Restraints According to Percentage of Total Points Allocated by Respondents, Global, 2016
  • 11. Smart City Pulse: Ranking of Short-term Smart City Influencers According to Percentage of Total Points Allocated by Respondents, Global, 2016
  • 12. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 13. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016
  • 14. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016
  • 15. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating their Organization Uses Each Smart City Solution Showcasing Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 16. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Level of Technology Influence on Future Smart City Developments, Global, 2016
  • 17. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Level of Technology Influence on Future Smart City Developments, Global, 2016
  • 18. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016
  • 19. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016
  • 20. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 21. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 22. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 23. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016
  • 24. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016
  • 25. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016
  • 26. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016
  • 27. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 28. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 29. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 30. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016
  • 31. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016
  • 32. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016
  • 33. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016
  • 34. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 35. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 36. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 37. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016
  • 38. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016
  • 39. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016
  • 40. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016
  • 41. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 42. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 43. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 44. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016
  • 45. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016
  • 46. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016
  • 47. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016
  • 48. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 49. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 50. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 51. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016
  • 52. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016
  • 53. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016
  • 54. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016
  • 55. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 56. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 57. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 58. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016
  • 59. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016
  • 60. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016
  • 61. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016
  • 62. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 63. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 64. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 65. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016
  • 66. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016
  • 67. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016
  • 68. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016
  • 69. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 70. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 71. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 72. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016
  • 73. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016
  • 74. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016
  • 75. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016
  • 76. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 77. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016
  • 78. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016
  • 79. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016
  • 80. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016
  • 81. Smart City Pulse: Total 2015 Revenues for Respondent Organization, Global, 2016
  • 82. Smart City Pulse: Respondent Level, Global, 2016
  • 83. Smart City Pulse: Regions Served by Respondent Organization (Including and Excluding Smart City Activity), Global, 2016
The Smart City movement continues to gain traction, with increasing connectivity and novel solutions joining forces to tackle urbanization's top challenges. As cities undertake Smart City initiatives, solution providers must develop offerings aligned with customer expectations, and city-customers must convey the motivators propelling and restraints impacting their projects. This study offers solution providers’ perspectives on current Smart City readiness and trends, including project intensity by region and revenue growth projections; top Smart City engagement challenges, city motivations, and project restraints; popular funding instruments; and predictions on technology innovations and future Smart City scenarios. The survey year is 2016.
More Information
No Index No
Podcast No
Table of Contents | Executive Summary~ || Key Findings~ | Research Scope, Background, and Methodology~ || Research Scope~ ||| Survey Year~ ||| Survey Timeframe~ ||| Geographical Scope~ ||| Concepts Covered~ || Research Background~ || Methodology~ | Smart City Revenue Trends, Growth Projections, and Regions of Focus~ || Activity in Smart City Concepts~ ||| Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in a Listed Smart City Concept, Global, 2016~ || Revenue Attributed to Smart City Solutions~ || Degree of Smart City Focus on Global Regions~ ||| Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Country is of Great Interest for their Organization’s Smart City Pursuits—Top 3 Countries per Region, Global, 2016~ ||| Smart City Pulse: Average Percentage of Smart City Focus Organizations Place on Listed Regions Broken Down by Region of Headquarters—North America, Europe, and Latin America Outflows, Global, 2016~ ||| Smart City Pulse: Average Percentage of Smart City Focus Organizations Place on Listed Regions Broken Down by Region of Headquarters—Middle East, Asia-Pacific, and Africa Outflows, Global, 2016~ || Activity in Smart City Concepts by Region of Focus~ || Current and Future Smart City Market Position~ ||| Smart City Pulse: Smart City Market Position Categories, Area of Focus, and Sample Solutions, Global, 2016~ | Smart City Receptivity, Challenges, Motivations, and Restraints~ || Receptivity to the Smart City Concept~ || Overview of Top 5 Challenges, Motivations, and Restraints for Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ || Smart City Engagement Challenges~ || Smart City Motivations~ || Smart City Project Restraints~ || Smart City Influencers~ | Smart City Funding, Business Model, and Future Trends~ || Smart City Funding Overview~ || Smart City Business Models~ || Smart City Project Types~ || Smart City Solution Showcasing Vehicle~ || Future Smart City Technologies~ | Smart City Themes Voiced by Respondents~ || Smart City Themes~ ||| Theme 1: Speed of Progress~ ||| Theme 2: Citizens-as-the-customer~ ||| Theme 3: Business Model Evolution~ ||| Theme 4: Sensors, Data, and Ubiquitous Connectivity~ ||| Theme 5: Improved Quality of Life, but Not Without Challenges~ | Smart City Concept Breakdowns~ || Smart Governance and Education~ || Smart Healthcare~ || Smart Buildings~ || Smart Mobility~ || Smart Infrastructure~ || Smart Technology~ || Smart Energy~ || Smart Citizens~ || Smart Security~ | The Last Word~ || Key Takeaways~ | Respondent Demographics~ || Organization Revenues and Respondent Levels~ || Region of Organization Headquarters~ || Regions Served by Organizations~ || Legal Disclaimer~ | Appendix~ || Other Responses Provided~
List of Charts and Figures 1. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2015 and 2016~ 2. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 3. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 4. Smart City Pulse: Average Percentage of Smart City Focus Organizations Place on Listed Regions, Global, 2016~ 5. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in a Listed Smart City Concept Broken Down by Region of Focus, Global, 2016~ 6. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Current and Future Market Position of Organizations, Global, 2016~ 7. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Degree of City-Customer Receptivity to Smart City Concepts by Population Size, Global, 2016~ 8. Smart City Pulse: Ranking of Project Engagement Challenges for Organizations According to Percentage of Total Points Allocated by Respondents, Global, 2016~ 9. Smart City Pulse: Ranking of City Motivations According to Percentage of Total Points Allocated by Respondents, Global, 2016*~ 10. Smart City Pulse: Ranking of Project Restraints According to Percentage of Total Points Allocated by Respondents, Global, 2016~ 11. Smart City Pulse: Ranking of Short-term Smart City Influencers According to Percentage of Total Points Allocated by Respondents, Global, 2016~ 12. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 13. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016~ 14. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016~ 15. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating their Organization Uses Each Smart City Solution Showcasing Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 16. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Level of Technology Influence on Future Smart City Developments, Global, 2016~ 17. Smart City Pulse: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Level of Technology Influence on Future Smart City Developments, Global, 2016~ 18. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016~ 19. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016~ 20. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 21. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 22. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 23. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016~ 24. Smart Governance and Education: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016~ 25. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016~ 26. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016~ 27. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 28. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 29. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 30. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016~ 31. Smart Healthcare: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016~ 32. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016~ 33. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016~ 34. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 35. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 36. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 37. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016~ 38. Smart Buildings: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016~ 39. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016~ 40. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016~ 41. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 42. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 43. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 44. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016~ 45. Smart Mobility: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016~ 46. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016~ 47. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016~ 48. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 49. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 50. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 51. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016~ 52. Smart Infrastructure: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016~ 53. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016~ 54. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016~ 55. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 56. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 57. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 58. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016~ 59. Smart Technology: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016~ 60. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016~ 61. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016~ 62. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 63. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 64. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 65. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016~ 66. Smart Energy: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016~ 67. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016~ 68. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016~ 69. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 70. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 71. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 72. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016~ 73. Smart Citizens: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016~ 74. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Organizational Activity in Other Smart City Concepts, Global, 2016~ 75. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Solution Categories of Greatest Interest for Cities, Global, 2016~ 76. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Revenue Band for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 77. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Projected Revenue Growth Rates for their Organization’s Smart City Solutions, Global, 2016~ 78. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Use of Funding Vehicle, Global, 2016~ 79. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Project Type that Represents the Majority of their Organization’s Smart City Engagements, Global, 2016~ 80. Smart Security: Percentage of Respondents Indicating Operates or Heavily Operates Under Smart City Business Models, Global, 2016~ 81. Smart City Pulse: Total 2015 Revenues for Respondent Organization, Global, 2016~ 82. Smart City Pulse: Respondent Level, Global, 2016~ 83. Smart City Pulse: Regions Served by Respondent Organization (Including and Excluding Smart City Activity), Global, 2016~
Author Jillian Walker
Industries Cross Industries
WIP Number K03B-01-00-00-00
Is Prebook No