HTML5 and Qt—Cooperation or Conflict

HTML5 and Qt—Cooperation or Conflict

Connected Vehicles to Provide the Driver with the Best Option—For Infotainment Systems, that may be Multiple Solutions

RELEASE DATE
16-Sep-2015
REGION
North America
Research Code: NEE8-01-00-00-00
SKU: AU01081-NA-MR_17191
AvailableYesPDF Download

$4,950.00

Special Price $3,712.50 save 25 %

In stock
SKU
AU01081-NA-MR_17191

$4,950.00

$3,712.50save 25 %

DownloadLink
ENQUIRE NOW

Description

The connected car is becoming increasingly complex. Drivers are beginning to expect the same type of connectivity in their vehicle as they receive with their smartphones. Automakers are faced with creating a safe and secure system while ensuring drivers have rich graphics and intuitive usability. HTML5 and Qt will be critical solutions that are used to develop connected systems within the vehicle. Both solutions provide unique tools for developers and both solutions are widely adopted in today's vehicles. Frost & Sullivan analyzes the pros and cons for each development tool along with key in-vehicle use cases.

Table of Contents

Key Findings and Predictions

Advantages for Both Qt and HTML5 Outweigh the Cons

Automotive Development Costs are High for Today’s Connected Car

Qt Solutions Give Developers Easy-to-Use Tools

In-Vehicle Electronics Causing Increased Costs for Automakers

Safety is and Always will be Critical Focus for Automakers

Conclusions and Predictions

Research Scope

Research Aims and Objectives

Research Background

Research Methodology

HTML is Everywhere in Today’s Technology

Use Cases for HTML5 in the Vehicle are Few

HTML5 is Beginning to Live up to its Hype

OpenCar Case Study

Obigo Case Study

M-Way Case Study

Mass-market OEMs are Helping Drive HTML5 Adoption Rates

Qt, Unlike HTML5 is a Privately-owned Technology

Developers Praise Qt for its Helpful Add-ons

Qt’s Smaller Footprint Allows for Niche Uses, such as Graphics

Improving the User Experience will be Qt’s Ultimate Goal

QNX Case Study

QNX is Entering New Connected Spaces Inside the Vehicle

QNX uses Qt for its New In-vehicle Solutions such as Rear-seat Screens

QNX Drives Qt Growth and Additional Suppliers will Jump On-board

Qt and HTML5 have Similar Tools and Attributes

Qt and HTML5 Both have Positive Future Outlooks

The Last Word—3 Big Predictions

Legal Disclaimer

Abbreviations and Acronyms Used

Market Engineering Methodology

List of Figures
  • 1. HTML5 & Qt: Passenger Car Sales, North America, 2014–2020
List of Charts
  • 1. HTML 5 & QT: Automotive Electronic Market Revenue Forecast, Global, 2014–2020
  • 2. HTML5 Solution Adoption Rates, North America, 2014–2020
  • 3. Qt Solution Adoption Rates, North America, 2014–2020
Related Research
The connected car is becoming increasingly complex. Drivers are beginning to expect the same type of connectivity in their vehicle as they receive with their smartphones. Automakers are faced with creating a safe and secure system while ensuring drivers have rich graphics and intuitive usability. HTML5 and Qt will be critical solutions that are used to develop connected systems within the vehicle. Both solutions provide unique tools for developers and both solutions are widely adopted in todays vehicles. Frost & Sullivan analyzes the pros and cons for each development tool along with key in-vehicle use cases.
More Information
No Index No
Podcast No
Table of Contents | Executive Summary~ || Key Findings and Predictions~ || Advantages for Both Qt and HTML5 Outweigh the Cons~ || Automotive Development Costs are High for Today’s Connected Car~ || Qt Solutions Give Developers Easy-to-Use Tools~ || In-Vehicle Electronics Causing Increased Costs for Automakers~ || Safety is and Always will be Critical Focus for Automakers~ || Conclusions and Predictions~ | Research Methodology~ || Research Scope~ ||| Base Year~ ||| Study Period~ ||| Forecast Period~ ||| Vehicle Type~ ||| Geographical Scope~ || Research Aims and Objectives~ || Research Background~ || Research Methodology~ ||| Secondary Research~ ||| Primary Research~ ||| HTML5 & Qt: Key Participants, North America, 2014~ |||| QNX~ |||| OpenCar~ |||| S1NN~ |||| Harman~ |||| Others~ | HTML5~ || HTML is Everywhere in Today’s Technology~ || Use Cases for HTML5 in the Vehicle are Few~ ||| Use Case~ ||| HTML 5 Features~ ||| OEM Advantage~ || HTML5 is Beginning to Live up to its Hype~ ||| OEM & Supplier Adoption of HTML5~ || OpenCar Case Study~ ||| Notes~ ||| OpenCar Platform Features~ ||| OpenCar Key Business Win~ || Obigo Case Study~ ||| Notes~ ||| Obigo Open Framework~ ||| Obigo App Framework~ || M-Way Case Study~ ||| M-Way automotive solutions~ || Mass-market OEMs are Helping Drive HTML5 Adoption Rates~ | Qt~ || Qt, Unlike HTML5 is a Privately-owned Technology~ || Developers Praise Qt for its Helpful Add-ons~ ||| Qt5 Essential Modules~ ||| Qt5 Goals~ ||| Qt5 Differences~ || Qt’s Smaller Footprint Allows for Niche Uses, such as Graphics~ ||| Qt Development Timeline, 2008–2014~ || Improving the User Experience will be Qt’s Ultimate Goal~ ||| Qt Automotive Use Cases~ || QNX Case Study~ || QNX is Entering New Connected Spaces Inside the Vehicle~ || QNX uses Qt for its New In-vehicle Solutions such as Rear-seat Screens~ || QNX Drives Qt Growth and Additional Suppliers will Jump On-board~ | Conclusions~ || Qt and HTML5 have Similar Tools and Attributes~ || Qt and HTML5 Both have Positive Future Outlooks~ || The Last Word—3 Big Predictions~ || Legal Disclaimer~ | Appendix~ || Abbreviations and Acronyms Used~ || Market Engineering Methodology~
List of Charts and Figures 1. HTML5 & Qt: Passenger Car Sales, North America, 2014–2020~| 1. HTML 5 & QT: Automotive Electronic Market Revenue Forecast, Global, 2014–2020~ 2. HTML5 Solution Adoption Rates, North America, 2014–2020~ 3. Qt Solution Adoption Rates, North America, 2014–2020~
Author Doug Gilman
Industries Automotive
WIP Number NEE8-01-00-00-00
Is Prebook No