Techno-economic Comparison of LFP and NMC Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicle Applications: Performance, Value Chain Analysis, and Growth Opportunities, 2024-2030

Techno-economic Comparison of LFP and NMC Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicle Applications: Performance, Value Chain Analysis, and Growth Opportunities, 2024-2030

LFP and NMC batteries provide distinct value propositions due to the performance differences exhibited by both chemistries

RELEASE DATE
04-Jul-2024
REGION
Global
Deliverable Type
Technology Research
Research Code: DAF3-01-00-00-00
SKU: EG_2024_838
AvailableYesPDF Download
$4,950.00
In stock
SKU
EG_2024_838
$4,950.00
DownloadLink
Purchase includes:
  • Report download
  • Growth dialog™ with our experts
Need more details?

Description

Rapid advancements in battery technology are imperative to develop the next generation of electric vehicles (EVs). Currently, the nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) and lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) variants of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries lead the market for EV battery packs, with LFP batteries witnessing increased penetration over the past few years. This is exacerbated by the use of critical materials, such as nickel and cobalt, used in NMC variants, as well as supply chain uncertainties and mining challenges associated with securing these metals, especially cobalt, which is concentrated in a few African countries and is an important human rights issue.

LFP and NMC batteries follow a distinct intercalation mechanism to trap lithium ions in their cathodes. NMC batteries store these ions within 2D interlayers, while LFP batteries store ions within 3D structures in the cathode material lattice. An important result of this is enhanced safety and a longer cycle life for LFP batteries. In addition, LFP batteries, by avoiding the use of rare materials during fabrication, come at a lower price point than the NMC variant, which is a critical parameter for their accelerated adoption in key global markets.

This study covers the following topics:
The technology landscape covers the major differences between LFP and MNC batteries as well as the various constituent materials used in their fabrication.
The comparative analysis of LFP and NMC batteries covers various performance parameters, including energy density, cost, and cycle life. The section also includes the application mapping for both battery variants.
The funding analysis covers stakeholders’ major funding instances for LFP and NMC batteries.
The patent landscape and growth opportunities analyze the key growth areas for both battery variants.

Table of Contents

Why Is It Increasingly Difficult to Grow?

The Strategic Imperative 8™

The Impact of the Top 3 Strategic Imperatives on LFP and NMC Batteries for the EV Industry

Growth Opportunities Fuel the Growth Pipeline Engine™

Research Methodology

Scope of Analysis

Segmentation

Growth Drivers

Growth Restraints

The NMC and LFP Variants are Popular in EV Battery Packs

EVs are on an Exponential Growth Trajectory Across the World

LFP Versus NMC Batteries: Distinct Constituent Cathode Materials Influence Battery Performance

NMC and LFP Cathodes Exhibit Contrary Intercalation

LFP Versus NMC Batteries: Performance Parameters

LFP Batteries Have Seen an Uptick in Adoption in Recent Years

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd (CATL), China

LG Chemical Ltd., South Korea

Other Prominent LFP and NMC Battery Companies

Patent Landscape

LFP and NMC Battery Manufacturers: Funding Information

Growth Opportunity 1: Facilitate the Launch of Cost-efficient EVs for Mass-market Adoption

Growth Opportunity 1: Facilitate the Launch of Cost-efficient EVs for Mass-market Adoption (continued)

Growth Opportunity 2: Enhance NMC Batteries to Pave the Way for the Electrification of Applications Witnessing High Demand

Growth Opportunity 2: Enhance NMC Batteries to Pave the Way for the Electrification of Applications Witnessing High Demand (continued)

Growth Opportunity 3: Improve LFP Batteries' Energy Density to Help Them Emerge as a Comprehensively Superior Solution

Growth Opportunity 3: Improve LFP Batteries' Energy Density to Help Them Emerge as a Comprehensively Superior Solution (continued)

Technology Readiness Levels (TRL): Explanation

Benefits and Impacts of Growth Opportunities

Next Steps

Take the Next Step

Legal Disclaimer

Growth dialog™

A tailored session with you where we identify the:
  • Strategic Imperatives
  • Growth Opportunities
  • Best Practices
  • Companies to Action

Impacting your company's future growth potential.

Rapid advancements in battery technology are imperative to develop the next generation of electric vehicles (EVs). Currently, the nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) and lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) variants of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries lead the market for EV battery packs, with LFP batteries witnessing increased penetration over the past few years. This is exacerbated by the use of critical materials, such as nickel and cobalt, used in NMC variants, as well as supply chain uncertainties and mining challenges associated with securing these metals, especially cobalt, which is concentrated in a few African countries and is an important human rights issue. LFP and NMC batteries follow a distinct intercalation mechanism to trap lithium ions in their cathodes. NMC batteries store these ions within 2D interlayers, while LFP batteries store ions within 3D structures in the cathode material lattice. An important result of this is enhanced safety and a longer cycle life for LFP batteries. In addition, LFP batteries, by avoiding the use of rare materials during fabrication, come at a lower price point than the NMC variant, which is a critical parameter for their accelerated adoption in key global markets. This study covers the following topics: The technology landscape covers the major differences between LFP and MNC batteries as well as the various constituent materials used in their fabrication. The comparative analysis of LFP and NMC batteries covers various performance parameters, including energy density, cost, and cycle life. The section also includes the application mapping for both battery variants. The funding analysis covers stakeholders major funding instances for LFP and NMC batteries. The patent landscape and growth opportunities analyze the key growth areas for both battery variants.
More Information
Deliverable Type Technology Research
Author Pankaj Gaur
Industries Energy
No Index No
Is Prebook No
Keyword 1 Lfp Battery
Keyword 2 Nmc Battery
Keyword 3 Electric Vehicle
Podcast No
WIP Number DAF3-01-00-00-00