Asia-Pacific Space Force Capability Structure

Asia-Pacific Space Force Capability Structure

Multi-domain Army Concepts, Dual-use Technologies, and Cyber-resilience Framework to Drive Future Technology Strategy

RELEASE DATE
15-Nov-2022
REGION
Asia Pacific
Deliverable Type
Market Research
Research Code: K836-01-00-00-00
SKU: AE01651-AP-MT_27118
AvailableYesPDF Download

$2,450.00

Special Price $2,082.50 save 15 %

In stock
SKU
AE01651-AP-MT_27118

Asia-Pacific Space Force Capability Structure
Published on: 15-Nov-2022 | SKU: AE01651-AP-MT_27118

Need more details?

$2,450.00

$2,082.50save 15 %

DownloadLink
Need more details?

This study provides an overview of the space force capacity structure of the Asia-Pacific. With an increase in tensions and conflict zones across the globe, military space capabilities have expanded to anticipate threats, respond to crises, and project power, guiding the development of offensive and defensive strategies vital to national interests. The changing space environment has highlighted the role of space as a distinct warfighting domain representing disparate theories and strategies pertaining to space power.

Russia and China’s positions on space are evolving to encompass information-driven capabilities as a pre-requisite to non-contact warfare, targeting assets and critical infrastructure to deprive the adversary of space-enabled information without geographically engaging in the physical theater of conflict. The national security space postures of most countries in the Asia-Pacific, however, focus on deterring and countering threats from space that infringe on national, allied, and partner interests. These differences in military postures and capabilities have the potential to expose systemic cracks.

With space becoming inextricably linked to crisis stability, major powers have begun developing counter-space capabilities to degrade and deter adversary spheres of influence. Strategic stability and deterrence postures are virtually non-existent in the space domain due to the lack of human casualties and first-strike instability, increasing the risk of escalation of terrestrial conflicts and disturbance of nuclear stability.

The 1967 United Nations treaty signed by Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to regulate the use of space and provide a framework for international space law failed to address anti-satellite weapons, the weaponization of space, resource utilization in the context of cislunar operations, and space debris deposition. As a result, major powers continue to develop kinetic and non-kinetic capabilities, exploiting grey areas in the treaty to conduct military operations in space.

The study focuses on China, India, Australia, Japan, and South Korea in terms of space force capabilities. It identifies the factors driving and restraining the industry in the region as well as the growth opportunities arising from the emerging changes that market players can leverage.

Author: Pravin Pradeep

Why is it Increasingly Difficult to Grow?

The Strategic Imperative 8™

The Impact of the Top 3 Strategic Imperatives on the Asia-Pacific Space Force Capability Structure

Growth Opportunities Fuel the Growth Pipeline Engine™

Threat Assessment: Kinetic Physical and Non-kinetic Physical

Threat Assessment: Electronic and Cyber

China: Technology Capability Assessment

China: Technology Capability Assessment (continued)

China: Technology Capability Assessment (continued)

China: Manufacturing Capability Assessment

China: Manned Spaceflight and Cislunar Operations

China: Manned Spaceflight & Cislunar Operations (continued)

China: Space Launch Capability

China: Space Launch Capability (continued)

China: Space Launch Capability (continued)

India: Technology Capability Assessment

India: Technology Capability Assessment (continued)

India: Manufacturing Capability Assessment

India: Manufacturing Capability Assessment (continued)

India: Manned Spaceflight and Cislunar Operations

India: Space Launch Capability

Australia: Technology Capability Assessment

Australia: Technology Capability Assessment (continued)

Australia: Technology Capability Assessment (continued)

Australia: Manufacturing Capability Assessment

Australia: Manufacturing Capability Assessment (continued)

Australia: Space Launch Capability

Japan: Technology Capability Assessment

Japan: Technology Capability Assessment (continued)

Japan: Manufacturing Capability Assessment

Japan: Manned Spaceflight and Cislunar Operations

Japan: Manned Spaceflight & Cislunar Operations (continued)

Japan: Manned Spaceflight & Cislunar Operations (continued)

Japan: Space Launch Capability

South Korea: Technology Capability Assessment

South Korea: Technology Capability Assessment (continued)

South Korea: Manufacturing Capability Assessment

South Korea: Manned Spaceflight and Cislunar Operations

South Korea: Space Launch Capability

Growth Drivers

Growth Driver Analysis

Growth Driver Analysis (continued)

Growth Driver Analysis (continued)

Growth Driver Analysis (continued)

Growth Restraints

Growth Restraint Analysis

Growth Restraint Analysis (continued)

Growth Restraint Analysis (continued)

Growth Opportunity 1: Advanced Cyber and Electronic Warfare Capabilities

Growth Opportunity 1: Advanced Cyber and Electronic Warfare Capabilities (continued)

Growth Opportunity 2: Multi-domain Army Concepts

Growth Opportunity 2: Multi-domain Army Concepts (continued)

Growth Opportunity 3: Terrestrial Platform Advances

Growth Opportunity 3: Terrestrial Platform Advances (continued)

List of Exhibits

Legal Disclaimer

Purchase includes:
  • Report download
  • Growth Dialog™ with our experts

Growth Dialog™

A tailored session with you where we identify the:
  • Strategic Imperatives
  • Growth Opportunities
  • Best Practices
  • Companies to Action

Impacting your company's future growth potential.

This study provides an overview of the space force capacity structure of the Asia-Pacific. With an increase in tensions and conflict zones across the globe, military space capabilities have expanded to anticipate threats, respond to crises, and project power, guiding the development of offensive and defensive strategies vital to national interests. The changing space environment has highlighted the role of space as a distinct warfighting domain representing disparate theories and strategies pertaining to space power. Russia and China’s positions on space are evolving to encompass information-driven capabilities as a pre-requisite to non-contact warfare, targeting assets and critical infrastructure to deprive the adversary of space-enabled information without geographically engaging in the physical theater of conflict. The national security space postures of most countries in the Asia-Pacific, however, focus on deterring and countering threats from space that infringe on national, allied, and partner interests. These differences in military postures and capabilities have the potential to expose systemic cracks. With space becoming inextricably linked to crisis stability, major powers have begun developing counter-space capabilities to degrade and deter adversary spheres of influence. Strategic stability and deterrence postures are virtually non-existent in the space domain due to the lack of human casualties and first-strike instability, increasing the risk of escalation of terrestrial conflicts and disturbance of nuclear stability. The 1967 United Nations treaty signed by Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to regulate the use of space and provide a framework for international space law failed to address anti-satellite weapons, the weaponization of space, resource utilization in the context of cislunar operations, and space debris deposition. As a result, major powers continue to develop kinetic and non-kinetic capabilities, exploiting grey areas in the treaty to conduct military operations in space. The study focuses on China, India, Australia, Japan, and South Korea in terms of space force capabilities. It identifies the factors driving and restraining the industry in the region as well as the growth opportunities arising from the emerging changes that market players can leverage. Author: Pravin Pradeep
More Information
Deliverable Type Market Research
Industries Aerospace, Defence and Security
No Index No
Is Prebook No
Podcast No
WIP Number K836-01-00-00-00