Benchmarking of Top 10 Independent Power Producers (IPPs) in ASEAN-6

Immediate Needs to Reduce CO2 Emission in IPPs Will Create an Opportunity of More Than $27 Billion

USD 1,500

* Required Fields

USD 1,500

PAY BY INVOICE

Be the first to review this product

IPPs in Southeast Asia, particularly ASEAN-6, face multiple challenges such as policy and regulatory restrictions and pressure to control carbon emissions. In addition, IPPs struggle to keep costs low to remain competitive while maintaining the highest quality in power generation, safety standards, and customer service. Incumbent technologies currently deployed in many IPPs are considered insufficient to reduce carbon emissions, although interest has been expressed on possible engagement in future expansions and construction of new IPP plants. This study aims to highlight the best practices of IPPs in ASEAN-6 with reference to parameters such as availability factor, capacity factor, thermal efficiency, expenses, and carbon emissions.

Table of Contents

Benchmarking of Top 10 Independent Power Producers (IPPs) in ASEAN-6Executive SummaryKey FindingsInstalled Capacity of IPPs in ASEAN-6Licensed Capacities of Top 10 IPPsOverview of the Power Industry in ASEAN-6Overview of Power Industry ParticipantsMarket Trends in Power IndustryMarket Trends in Power Industry (continued)Overview of IPPValue Chain of IPPTotal Power Generation and IPP Capacity per CapitaDrivers and Restraints for IPPsDrivers ExplainedDrivers Explained (continued)Drivers Explained (continued)Restraints ExplainedBenchmarking of Top 10 IPP Plants in ASEAN-6Selection MethodologyBenchmarking Parameters Benchmarking Parameters (continued)Inputs for Benchmarking ParametersInstalled CapacityYear of Commissioning Versus Availability Factor (AF)Contribution to Country Versus Capacity Factor (CF)Year of Commissioning Versus Capacity FactorYear of Commissioning Versus Thermal Efficiency (TE) Capacity Factor Versus O&M ExpenseO&M Expense Versus Fuel ExpenseYear of Commissioning Versus CO EmissionImprovement Gaps to Achieve CO Emission Target in 2030CO Abatement Investment PotentialOpportunity for Carbon AbatementIPP ProfilesSenoko Power StationPaiton Energy PlantRatchaburi Power PlantKapar Power PlantSual Power PlantVung Ang Thermal Power PlantYTL PowerSeraya Power PlantTuas Power PlantTanjung Bin Power PlantTNB Janamanjung Power PlantLegal DisclaimerAppendixKey AbbreviationsKey Abbreviations (continued)Key Abbreviations (continued)Key Abbreviations (continued)DefinitionsAssumptionsIPPs with Over 1,000 MW Capacities in ASEAN-6IPPs with Over 1,000 MW Capacities in ASEAN-6 (continued)IPPs with Over 1,000 MW Capacities in ASEAN-6 (continued)Estimation of CO2 Emission Target in 2030 in ASEAN PPP Conversion FactorsPPP Conversion Factors (continued)The Frost & Sullivan StoryThe Frost & Sullivan StoryValue Proposition: Future of Your Company & CareerGlobal PerspectiveIndustry Convergence360º Research PerspectiveImplementation ExcellenceOur Blue Ocean Strategy




Related Research

Release Date : 06-Jun-17

Region : Asia Pacific

Release Date : 16-May-17

Region : Asia Pacific

Release Date : 02-Jan-17

Region : Asia Pacific

Why Frost & Sullivan

Working with the CEO’s growth team to create a vision based on a transformation growth strategy

Creating content-based digital marketing strategies that leverage our research perspective to differentiate and “tell your story”

Tracking over 1000 emerging technologies and analyzing the impact by industry and application to reveal the companies to watch in each sector

The Frost & Sullivan team is based in our 45 global offices and have developed a powerful global understandings of how industries operate on a global level.