USD
GBP
CNY
EUR
INR
JPY
MYR
ZAR
KRW
THB
Evolving Concept of Operations (CONOPs) Within the Global Safe City Industry, 2020
Evolving Concept of Operations (CONOPs) Within the Global Safe City Industry, 2020
Understanding the Growth and Technology Strategies Influencing the Design, Acquisition, and Implementation of SmartSafe City Progr
31-Jul-2020
Global
$4,950.00
Special Price $3,712.50 save 25 %
Description
In a city’s continued journey to progressing its municipality to a global smart city designation, a key tenet of Smart Cities is the establishment of SmartSafe City programs that can help centralize disaster response and public safety monitoring and response, and better coordinate public safety initiatives and goals. Many cities or law enforcement agencies have launched similar programs on a smaller scale or in limited neighborhoods within a city; however, the ability to scale these programs to serve broader public safety goals has continued to be a major challenge for cities both in the immediate and long terms. Cities struggle with scalability due to impacted program funding, outdated technologies, or a combination of both factors, which only continue to hinder a city’s progress in adopting broader initiatives. The success of many SmartSafe City programs also hinges on a delicate balance between technology products in use for public safety activities, strict processes in place to maintain ongoing operations or respond to and report detected events and threats, and the policies put in place regarding threat or incident reporting, data privacy, and compliance. Due to the significant differences in operational structure, political landscapes, digitalization progress, and public willingness to allow more robust public safety activities, cities are finding that a tailored approach to their concept of operations for SmartSafe City programs is the only way to come up with a solution that can work for them.
Research Scope
This research service includes information on the concept of operations variance across global cities that have been classified according to Frost & Sullivan’s internal SmartSafe City ranking criteria. Using this ranking structure, Frost & Sullivan has classified the select top-100 cities across the world according to their level of development for their SmartSafe City programs. Additionally, this research looks into the range of concept of operation structures for SmartSafe City Programs, classifying them according to 3 types of programs based on human resources, technical reliance, automation, and other factors. This study also focuses on the physical and digital threat landscape that is increasingly targeting city operations and public safety, as well as profiling relevant use cases of each type of SmartSafe City concept of operations model from across the globe. This service then focuses on technology and solutions that best fit the customer needs of each SmartSafe City program type, relevant growth opportunities for solution vendors, and the solution types and vendor landscape currently operational in the industry.
This research service also discusses how various technology solutions and the technical maturity of cities affects how they plan for future investments in their SmartSafe City programs. This service also identifies industry growth opportunities by city development type and provides a succinct conclusions section that highlights trends in the market.
Key Issues Addressed
- What are the types of concept of operations that influence how SmartSafe City programs are run globally?
- What are the similarities that exist between cities utilizing the various models?
- What security technologies and capability mix are required to build and achieve the goals of a broader SmartSafe City program?
- Which are the key stakeholders involved in a SmartSafe City program, its system design, purchase, and implementation?
- What are the critical pain points and threat vectors facing city operators, necessitating the use of more SmartSafe City solutions? How can they be overcome?
- What are the top Mega Trends of new technologies poised to disrupt or drive growth and investment in SmartSafe City solutions? Which vendors could bring about these solutions?
- What are the key capabilities that city operators continue to explore and look for potential investment opportunities?
Author: Danielle VanZandt
RESEARCH: INFOGRAPHIC
This infographic presents a brief overview of the research, and highlights the key topics discussed in it.Click image to view it in full size
Table of Contents
Analysis Factsheet
Development Scale of Safe City Programs for Top 100 Cities
Trends Impacting Demand
Executive Summary—Key Predictions
Technical Landscape—How Technology Helps Safe City Programs Achieve Key Program Goals
Mapping of Safe City Stakeholders and Influence Levels
Major Goals and Objectives of Safe Cities
Research Scope
Top 100 Smart Cities for Safe City Project Consideration
Top 100 Smart Cities for Safe City Project Consideration (continued)
Technical Categorization—City Rankings and Definitions
Technical Categorization—City Rankings and Definitions (continued)
Technology Segmentation—Definitions
Research Objectives and Questions
Rising Digital Threats Alongside Physical Security Incidents—Previous Attacks Targeting City Infrastructure
Major Physical Threats Targeting Cities
Lone Wolf Attacks—Serving a Personal or Ideological Vendetta
‘Soft Target’ Attacks—Amplifying the Attack’s Purpose
Terrorism—Inciting Fear for a Stated Goal
Major Digital Threats Targeting Cities
Ransomware—Profiting on Successful Attacks
Malware Infiltration—Long-term Infection and Data Siphoning
Privileged Credential Abuse—Attacking the Administrators
Concept of Operations—Determining City’s Best Strategy
Safe City Solutions—Design Considerations
SmartSafe City Programs—Securing Citizens
Concept of Operations—Scale for SmartSafe City Programs
Concept of Operations—People-Driven Strategies
Concept of Operations—Hybrid-Digital Strategies
Concept of Operations—Technology-Driven Strategies
People-Focused Concept of Operations Architecture
Hybrid-Digital Concept of Operations Architecture
Technology-Focused Concept of Operations Architecture
Case Study—City of Chicago
Case Study—Tokyo Metropolitan Area
Case Study—Minerva Programme, United Kingdom
Case Study—Singapore City-State
Case Study—City of Los Angeles
Case Study—Tigre City, Buenos Aires
Top of Mind—Inherent Risks for SmartSafe City Solutions
Top of Mind—Gaps in SmartSafe City Program Coverage
Trend Analysis—Overcoming Risk Factors
Trend Analysis—Patching Solution Gaps
Best Practices—Top Considerations for SmartSafe City Programs
Select Vendors for SmartSafe City Program Solutions
Capability Impact—Evolving Technologies
Capability Impact—Evolving Technologies (continued)
Growth Opportunity 1—Cloud Migration
Growth Opportunity 2—Digitalization of Legacy Programs
Growth Opportunity 3—Sensorization of Everything
Growth Opportunity 4—Automated Operations
Growth Opportunity 5—Multi-source Event Analysis
Strategic Imperatives for Success and Growth
Key Conclusions
The Last Word—3 Big Predictions
Legal Disclaimer
Abbreviations
Abbreviations (continued)
Additional Sources of Information on Safe City Solutions
List of Exhibits
The Frost & Sullivan Story
Value Proposition—Future of Your Company & Career
Global Perspective
Industry Convergence
360º Research Perspective
Implementation Excellence
Our Blue Ocean Strategy
Popular Topics
Research Scope
This research service includes information on the concept of operations variance across global cities that have been classified according to Frost & Sullivan’s internal SmartSafe City ranking criteria. Using this ranking structure, Frost & Sullivan has classified the select top-100 cities across the world according to their level of development for their SmartSafe City programs. Additionally, this research looks into the range of concept of operation structures for SmartSafe City Programs, classifying them according to 3 types of programs based on human resources, technical reliance, automation, and other factors. This study also focuses on the physical and digital threat landscape that is increasingly targeting city operations and public safety, as well as profiling relevant use cases of each type of SmartSafe City concept of operations model from across the globe. This service then focuses on technology and solutions that best fit the customer needs of each SmartSafe City program type, relevant growth opportunities for solution vendors, and the solution types and vendor landscape currently operational in the industry.
This research service also discusses how various technology solutions and the technical maturity of cities affects how they plan for future investments in their SmartSafe City programs. This service also identifies industry growth opportunities by city development type and provides a succinct conclusions section that highlights trends in the market.
Key Issues Addressed
- What are the types of concept of operations that influence how SmartSafe City programs are run globally
- What are the similarities that exist between cities utilizing the various models
- What security technologies and capability mix are required to build and achieve the goals of a broader SmartSafe City program
- Which are the key stakeholders involved in a SmartSafe City program, its system design, purchase, and implementation
- What are the critical pain points and threat vectors facing city operators, necessitating the use of more SmartSafe City solutions How can they be overcome
- What are the top Mega Trends of new technologies poised to disrupt or drive growth and investment in SmartSafe City solutions Which vendors could bring about these solutions
- What are the key capabilities that city operators continue to explore and look for potential investment opportunities
Author: Danielle VanZandt
| No Index | No |
|---|---|
| Podcast | No |
| Author | Danielle VanZandt |
| Industries | Aerospace, Defence and Security |
| WIP Number | K4C1-01-00-00-00 |
| Is Prebook | No |
| GPS Codes | 99D5-A1,9AC9-A3 |